From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update numactl Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:55:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87io47sp3l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151017194917.GA28893@debian> <20151017211825.GA20502@debian> <20151208221242.GB8597@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6fE0-0004QH-2C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:56:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6fDu-0002e7-Sc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:56:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151208221242.GB8597@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:12:42 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >> It does not build on arm. On debian, hwloc does not depend on libnuma >> on the armel and armhf architectures: >> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/libhwloc5 >> So maybe we could make it an input only for non-arm architectures? > > What do you think of this suggestion? What=E2=80=99s the rationale for this special case? That libnuma doesn=E2= =80=99t support ARM? If that=E2=80=99s the case, the suggestion sounds good to me. Ludo=E2=80=99.