From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add erlang.
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:54:45 +0100
Message-ID: <87io1hvl62.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CA+xn8YDemiCuOf569TUfP3XAMKpDhF-JqeymgCU0ntHRorPZsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160104043952.GA29303@jasmine>
	<CA+xn8YCU5_WizeVShKQ_2LaF-uDAY4H57o_nYjxDRuEv-TkJyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<877fjpzi07.fsf@igalia.com> <87wprmg088.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y4c1ww4y.fsf@igalia.com>
	<CA+xn8YCBfR9nQ+CcfvQrGBy3Wamb3=kTqVik8xu_LA3jC7xfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160213004446.GB13163@jasmine>
	<20160213231244.1ecfb8be@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40445)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aXb1n-0004nl-V4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:54:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aXb1k-0007MG-L9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:54:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160213231244.1ecfb8be@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's
	message of "Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:12:44 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:44:46 -0500
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:45:39PM -0800, Steve Sprang wrote:
>> > It looks like downloading the tarball from erlang.org works now.
>> > Here's an improved patch.=20=20
>> > +	   (lambda* _
>> > +	     (let ((escripts
>> > +		    (append
>> > +		     (find-files "." "\\.escript")
>> > +		     (find-files "lib/stdlib/test/escript_SUITE_data/")
>> > +		     '("erts/lib_src/utils/make_atomics_api"
>> > +		       "erts/preloaded/src/add_abstract_code"
>> > +		       "lib/diameter/bin/diameterc"
>> > +		       "lib/reltool/examples/display_args"
>> > +		       "lib/reltool/examples/mnesia_core_dump_viewer"
>> > +		       "lib/snmp/src/compile/snmpc.src"
>> > +		       "make/verify_runtime_dependencies"
>> > +		       "make/emd2exml.in"))))
>> > +	       (substitute* escripts
>> > +		 (("/usr/bin/env") (which "env"))))))
>> > +         (add-before
>> > +             'configure 'set-erl-top
>> > +           (lambda* _
>> > +             (setenv "ERL_TOP" (getcwd)))))=20=20
>>=20
>> I _think_ that 'lambda _' would be appropriate here. I need a real
>> Schemer to weigh in ;)
>>=20
>
> I'm definately not a "real schemer," but since the lambda only leads into=
 the
> let (ie. one item), I'm pretty sure 'lambda _' should be sufficient.

Correct.  =E2=80=98lambda*=E2=80=99 is for when one wants to use optional o=
r keyword
arguments (info "(guile) lambda* and define*").

Ludo=E2=80=99.