From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: man-db: Use modify-phases syntax. Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:56:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87inu7v8s4.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20160907084707.11557-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20160907090517.GD25070@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <8760q7omxv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhi1X-0004Jh-Sx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:56:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhi1W-0005dj-1j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:56:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <8760q7omxv.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:47:06AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> * gnu/packages/man.scm (man-db)[arguments]: Use modify-phases syntax. > > [...] > >> The patches look good to me. Also my quick test didn't show it causing >> mass rebuilds. > > Same here. > > Thanks for finding out what the problem was! Pushed as ea55a39530d6604cde07d5b23ba529a07a76ea7b. Thanks! ~~ Ricardo