From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Subject: Re: guix is the guildhall that we always wanted!
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:51:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87inn8l7jm.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
References: <87zigl3wph.fsf@pobox.com> <87a88kanjq.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87a88kanjq.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 16
	Mar 2017 18:01:45 -0400")
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "guile-user" <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>, guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>:

> We need to keep all Guix package definitions within Guix itself, for
> the same reason that Linux (the kernel) developers insist on keeping
> all device drivers within a single monolithic tree.

I think that's one of the most unfortunate aspects of Linux.

Just saying.


Marko