From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A Suggestion about guix-devel-mode
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:04:48 -0700
Message-ID: <87inm8qrfz.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87o9w2mtgi.fsf@163.com> <871ssy2gjy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<878tn5oxq0.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpaonyq9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45175)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1cygIq-0006lS-Vu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:04:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1cygIm-00053H-EX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:04:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87wpaonyq9.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:55:42 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Feng Shu <tumashu@163.com>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> To make it clear, this is a question about Emacs-Guix.
>>>
>>> Feng Shu (2017-04-12 07:10 +0800) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe we should add three addition keybinding:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Force rebuild the package defined by the current variable definitio=
n.
>>>
>>> What do you mean?  What is the analogous guix shell command?
>>
>> I could be wrong, but I don't think you can in general force a rebuild.
>> The only way to force a rebuild that I know of is to GC the store path
>> and then rebuild the package or derivation.  If I'm wrong, someone
>> please correct me!
>
> You can also force a rebuild with =E2=80=9Cguix build foo --check=E2=80=
=9D, whose main
> purpose is to check for bit-reproducibility.

Good to know!  Thank you for the tip.

=2D-=20
Chris

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8Ap4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--