From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: weird errors Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:38:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87inc4xun9.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87a7xhmpht.fsf@gnu.org> <20180114114346.78977872@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ealJR-0003bF-WE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:39:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ealJO-0001gt-Tj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:39:14 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ealJO-0001ff-NN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:39:10 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Catonano Cc: guix-devel Catonano writes: >> I'd just call (setenv "/gnu/store/some-hash-passfile") instead of >> starting a whole shell (it's a waste and increases the attach surface fo= r >> no reason to use a shell here). >> > > I can certainly do like you suggest. It's cleaner > > But "trytond-admin" has to be called finally. Doesn't this require a shel= l > anyway ? No, it actually doesn=E2=80=99t. There are different ways to execute progr= ams, and only one of them is to spawn a shell and have the shell handle the execution. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net