From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Pre-built binaries vs. performance Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:54:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87inbgmz0y.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87y3ketaf6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehI7o-0007OO-8r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:54:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehI7l-0003d9-52 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:54:12 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:34921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehI7k-0003aS-S7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:54:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Fis Trivial's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:49:09 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Fis Trivial Cc: guix-devel Hello, Fis Trivial skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hello Guix! >> >> This post is a followup to our previous discussions on how to handle >> architecture-specific optimizations: >> >> https://guix-hpc.bordeaux.inria.fr/blog/2018/01/pre-built-binaries-vs-= performance/ >> >> Comments welcome! >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Instructions support seems like just another kind of runtime dependency, > can we reconsider this: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-01/msg00166.html What do you mean? The thread you=E2=80=99re referring to doesn=E2=80=99t d= iscuss architecture-specific optimizations. Ludo=E2=80=99.