From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on
	armhf.
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:21:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87in5veaao.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20180702101757.22792.51026@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20180702101758.97A6020543@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<8736x1r1g0.fsf@netris.org> <877emdwm0f.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<87efgknn2v.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60868)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fac67-0002UB-Ko
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 03:21:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fac66-0004Wd-Pm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 03:21:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87efgknn2v.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 03
	Jul 2018 15:20:08 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> The end result is that the wishes of the x86_64-using majority are the
> only ones that seem to matter in this community, and other users are
> frequently left in a bad spot.  This makes it increasingly unlikely that
> we'll ever gain a significant number of non-x86_64 users.

This kind of rant is really unhelpful.  You=E2=80=99re shouting at someone =
who
*is* doing the work of keeping things running.  And yes, when you do
that work, sometimes you have to choose between two suboptimal solutions
while waiting for a proper fix.

Generalizations about =E2=80=9Cthis community=E2=80=9D obviously make no se=
nse.  You are
a part of =E2=80=9Cthis community=E2=80=9D so it cares just as much as you =
do.

Please let=E2=80=99s work in a friendly manner towards finding solutions to=
 the
problems.

Thank you,
Ludo=E2=80=99.