From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Blog: Guix packaging tutorial Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:13:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87in29q495.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87in397jsd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9cmj0fc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mus6iypf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhw02ea9.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87o9cex112.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87efdau5x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87murywuvn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg7go8cv.fsf@gnu.org> <87va6kuyk4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sh1ot9m5.fsf@elephly.net> <87bm8bv4ao.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874le2j3ox.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9c4qxek.fsf@elephly.net> <87sh1g9t74.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87in2cqkf9.fsf@elephly.net> <87pnwk9jl9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9c49ig9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg789f5s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h8hu9fry.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvlu7wst.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAFFG-0007kb-H3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:13:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAFFE-0005NR-Sm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:13:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tvlu7wst.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel , George Clemmer , guix-blog@gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt writes: >> This LGTM except ... the first paragraphs (quoted below) are an >> advertisement. This is out of place in a tutorial. So, IMO, they should >> simply be removed. > > It's a tutorial addressed to newcomers, so I believe it's important that we > mention (or remind?) what Guix can do, because this is precisely what we are > tackling in this tutorial. I don't think it's a problem, actually I think it's > necessary as part of the introduction. I agree. It works very well as an introduction. -- Ricardo