From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems. Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:37:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87imt95qtc.fsf@netris.org> References: <20190613121214.23499.29535@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190613121215.EBF7320949@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbThy-0006Xb-Fk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:40:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbThu-0006x0-5B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:40:18 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:46254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbTht-0006AM-Fu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:40:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190613121215.EBF7320949@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> (guix-commits@gnu.org's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:12:15 -0400 (EDT)") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Marius, guix-commits@gnu.org writes: > mbakke pushed a commit to branch staging > in repository guix. > > commit 2a9d89afb6fb869dd2bdf1e9f710f487786930fc > Author: Marius Bakke > Date: Thu Jun 13 14:08:32 2019 +0200 > > gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems. > > * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gstreamer)[arguments]: When building for a > 32-bit system, add #:phases. [...] > + ,@(if (not (target-64bit?)) > + ;; Skip test that fails on 32-bit systems: > + ;; . > + `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-before 'check 'disable-gstbufferpool-test > + (lambda _ > + (substitute* "tests/check/Makefile" > + (("^[[:blank:]]+gst/gstbufferpool.*$") > + "")) > + #t)))) > + '()))) This might be sweeping a critical bug under the rug. Does Unexpected critical/warning: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed really sound like something we can safely ignore? Mark