From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: "guix deploy" is in git master
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:23:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87imscjmwb.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87a7drn0ux.fsf@dustycloud.org> <874l3zse7o.fsf@elephly.net>
 <87wogujmld.fsf@elephly.net> <871rz19a4h.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87r270ig1d.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87lfx8jphz.fsf@elephly.net>
 <875zoci8x6.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87y318gu3b.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49340)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hkaB5-00048g-QY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:24:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hkaB4-0002Wn-Sh
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:23:59 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21213)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hkaB4-0002WO-Kf
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:23:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <87y318gu3b.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Jakob L. Kreuze <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:

> zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes:
>
>> Well, we can pick and choose which exceptions we continue on. For
>> services not being started, we can probably carry on with the
>> deployment. I think, ideally, in the situations where 'guix deploy'
>> should stop, we should try to clean up a bit? Though I'm not yet sure
>> how we'd go about that aside from rolling back the system generation.
>
> On that note, perhaps I'll hold off for now on a patch to better handle
> SSH authentication errors. Error reporting is the common issue here.

Sounds good.  A more general strategy is needed here.

-- 
Ricardo