From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: fc-cache -f --> fc-cache -fv in the manual Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:59:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87impyddtm.fsf@nckx> References: <86woegqgw4.fsf@dismail.de> <87woegcchy.fsf@nckx> <86impysxua.fsf@dismail.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i851Q-0000dX-K9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:59:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i851P-00070g-GW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:59:08 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:41124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i851O-0006zA-RJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:59:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <86impysxua.fsf@dismail.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org, Joshua Branson --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joshua, Joshua Branson =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > So I went ahead and changed "fc-cache -f" to "fc-cache -frv". I=20 > also > only applied the change for the English manual. I believe the=20 > commit > message is in a proper changelog format. What do you think? Looks good! I made only the following tweaks: =2D Capital letter after =E2=80=98:=E2=80=99 (not English, just our convent= ion). =2D Full stops after sentences, and prefer sentences over=20 fragments/symbols. =2D It wasn't obvious which =E2=80=98command=E2=80=99 the first line was ta= lking=20 about. As =E2=80=98-r=E2=80=99 doesn't mean =E2=80=98recursive=E2=80=99 but =E2=80= =98--really-force=E2=80=99 and=20 implies =E2=80=98-f=E2=80=99, I adjusted your patch accordingly and pushed = it as=20 0cd3e99d64081e958919845ddd01ae8d2fb2d692. Thanks! Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXXkZxQAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eWfqAP9eX5aKOAo4dSL5KVDNhDJOrtVjWGfjA5iLap8M2BlwVwD+LyF3eKohmdw2 MiRPCfu1nRtBzL1LoamO5d6aJ89wDgI= =k4NO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--