Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Users are not supposed to see backtraces coming from the daemon or its >> helpers (‘guix substitute’, ‘guix offload’, etc.). > > How are we supposed to debug Guix daemon errors? You can run it directly from a shell, and/or attach a debugger. I agree that if a failure happens on the daemon level, Guix should print an actionable error message instead of a confusing back trace.