zimoun writes: > Hi Chris, > > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 17:29, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> I've pushed a rebased version of this patch now. I've also recofigured >> bayfront to apply these changes. Checking with guix weather, I think it >> might be helping. > > Nice! > > What about reconfigure ci.guix.gnu.org and close bug#41708? > > http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41708 Indeed, hopefully that can happen soon. >> → guix weather --substitute-urls=https://bayfront.guix.gnu.org > > [...] > >> 13.8% (897 out of 6,519) of the missing items are queued >> at least 1,000 queued builds >> x86_64-linux: 1000 (100.0%) >> build rate: 9.34 builds per hour >> x86_64-linux: 9.34 builds per hour > > I think it is the first I see these results instead of the 504. :-) > With "guix e782756", it is: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > 65.7% substitutes available (9,425 out of 14,354) > at least 57,816.3 MiB of nars (compressed) > 97,343.9 MiB on disk (uncompressed) > 0.010 seconds per request (138.1 seconds in total) > 103.0 requests per second > > 0.0% (0 out of 4,929) of the missing items are queued > at least 1,000 queued builds > x86_64-linux: 1000 (100.0%) > build rate: 9.20 builds per hour > x86_64-linux: 9.20 builds per hour > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Hum? Almost 1/3 of substitutes are not available and in the same time > not queued. Is it expected? Does it mean that 1/3 of the builds are > failing? Probably not, most likely canceled or a dependency failed to build. I looked at a recent revision using the Guix Data Service, and it's unclear [1]. Lots of builds are unknown, and I'm not sure why that would be. 1: http://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/d291b454bd402c88eed1464a1dfa058a2f663874/builds