From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CAS7LBGGj18jCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:51:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id mGoCKBGGj19GegAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:51:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F56D9407C8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2Lf-0006U0-VB for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:51:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2LQ-0006Tt-Ma for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:51:12 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:44522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2LO-0003EI-ED for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:51:12 -0400 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E32726616; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:50:28 -0400 (EDT) References: <87ft6c1ypz.fsf@dustycloud.org> <865z77smyg.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6wizuic.fsf@dustycloud.org> <868sc27cix.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9f6w3jw.fsf@dustycloud.org> <86eelu3x7v.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.12; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: "Bonface M. K." Subject: Re: Racket packages / build system In-reply-to: <86eelu3x7v.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:49:57 -0400 Message-ID: <87imb4o11m.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/20 20:50:52 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Dimos Dimakakos Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: w6VY8vKv8WII Bonface M. K. writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber > writes: > > [...] > >>> Can I volunteer on this task? There's some work in >>> my team done in Racket; and it would be of great >>> interest to us to have a working Racket build >>> system. I can set apart some time to work on >>> this. I'd ask for alot of guidance/ review on this >>> though :) >> >> YES! Please do. Let's talk. You can ping me on IRC also, dustyweb on >> freenode. >> > > Thanks! I'm called bonz060 on FreeNode; though nowadays I've > grown to be an e-mail person. > > [...] > >>> Please do share the notes! I can try to hack >>> something up \m/\m/. >> >> I looked at the email that Dimos sent to me (also the email I had was >> apparently not the most recent email that they are using, corrected in >> the addressing this time), and they had asked me if they should post it >> to the mailing list, so I think that's consent to post it since they >> expressed consideration in doing so in our exchange... so I'm attaching >> it. >> > > [...] > > Thanks for the notes. I've skimmed through them > and they seem sensible. I'll look at how other > build systems are written as a first step, then > get my hands wet. > > Do I open an issue for this---I can't see anything > that tracks this even in archived issues--- then > send patches there? Or do I send patches off the > list and then submit the final drafts(if we get > there) on the list later? That sounds like a great plan!