From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +HOXC69usl9ERgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:21:03 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id sJpsB69usl9PKwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:21:03 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E97E69402A7 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kedVF-00009u-UX for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:21:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kedV7-00008o-3l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:20:53 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:59441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kedV4-0001y1-QU; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:20:52 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2176A1C0013; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:20:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: zimoun , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix In-Reply-To: <86wnylse6h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ft5dzj2z.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuttci4z.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87pn4g8eay.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ft5bd8gz.fsf@elephly.net> <87pn4d1xpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87blfxd5i8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86wnylse6h.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:20:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87ima5bihw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.197; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay5-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/16 07:20:45 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.92, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ryan Prior Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-TUID: iRugKaFHtC3H --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable zimoun writes: >> Sadly it's the part that exposes one of the most obvious issues: >> guix-devel-build-package-definition ("C-c . b") chokes Geiser and hangs >> Emacs. > > First, please Pierre, could you stop to refer to > `guix-devel-build-package-definition' when the correct one is > `guix-build-package'; which needs some updates, I agree. Patch should > come=E2=80=A6 Misunderstanding? guix-devel-build-package-definition is an actual command, why do you think this is incorrect? Are you talking about something else? Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but your last paragraph reads a bit brash. Let's keep this a friendly conversation! :) > Second, the issues with building packages using Emacs-Guix are about > implementation details i.e., fix the use of the API. I am still missing > why Geiser chokes when =E2=80=9Cguix repl=E2=80=9D in =E2=80=99M-x shell= =E2=80=99 do not since they are > both inherited from `comint-mode'. It's partly explored here: https://gitlab.com/emacs-geiser/geiser/-/issues/9 =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+ybpsSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/OL8H/jptcQiCVYnDU/wRQF9sUU8dyxHu9ybe GjNLZKMDuaB/aGb9ik3eQaz7rN5mFviYJ/5peAiMaXCpuD5YG7uTmZ5Qv+PtnNtz /JbIWDGDSv1IXbA5m1mj62VQFkkfitCgWC6PsadRVGVo0l41IHizt4CGpyw81SRV Fc865n/m3iCKRUKxhineVkyAwsoI+INFVg9CTSe8QMUd18aN6otPAmN4o0qs3r4e 19ZH6TKBijhHr/lBZKTNhMiwvAFZ6SRmUDajnEBFCHyXl3EWYuKMXkTefcRrTVDK E8zrlfL1cQxUAMO3Xg6yF07F42+ToRtvoM7dXscyjRslyEyGQlQBsa0= =6dUS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--