zimoun writes: >> Sadly it's the part that exposes one of the most obvious issues: >> guix-devel-build-package-definition ("C-c . b") chokes Geiser and hangs >> Emacs. > > First, please Pierre, could you stop to refer to > `guix-devel-build-package-definition' when the correct one is > `guix-build-package'; which needs some updates, I agree. Patch should > come… Misunderstanding? guix-devel-build-package-definition is an actual command, why do you think this is incorrect? Are you talking about something else? Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but your last paragraph reads a bit brash. Let's keep this a friendly conversation! :) > Second, the issues with building packages using Emacs-Guix are about > implementation details i.e., fix the use of the API. I am still missing > why Geiser chokes when “guix repl” in ’M-x shell’ do not since they are > both inherited from `comint-mode'. It's partly explored here: https://gitlab.com/emacs-geiser/geiser/-/issues/9 -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/