From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id QMtqL+FMe2PZ+QAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:03:13 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id YFVhL+FMe2NnRAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:03:13 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8AF2F35B for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:03:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox3de-0001pA-FF; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 05:02:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox3dZ-0001na-FE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 05:02:50 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox3dZ-0000OA-6o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 05:02:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=3Kk44JZWC2K2lMsCTuP4RnbtCug7vYVNYah0tUuDni4=; b=GKE092V89IIl0JP98tQu rORraD0ok+K8IQsa01zpkpleqFy3Vkb17rD7ikLa3B3Ae7RaYkoSKlLRUYzHbcvkx6odTgXhHf06M WuNvsHrciyThOt/a6R7R12uHK+yx0ZCTzcDkUg22Li+/snvygH/uzmRZeicqG3pmHoa+3ejzThnS3 Rb8Y601JNE41GozjBLJjbw1fCHmb9gY6zexguf0eDCcXRMxfSw9tblJlWv+S1Wcv9t9Fwq2w6c9+q BdXAi/RAN6hLTejKP1z7Y8qce/bWclW6xtFk+gciTlO2VC/o8jSyfnDqCEPoSJ3a1Se4IWJ0aLRGH SiQu2CYSsnHamw==; Received: from [193.50.110.147] (helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ox3dP-0002wR-Uq; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 05:02:48 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: Guix Devel Subject: Re: Release progress, week 6 References: <87r0y1h8is.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu2wujk5.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Primidi 1 Frimaire an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9vol?= =?utf-8?Q?ution=2C?= jour de la Raiponce X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:02:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tu2wujk5.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:52:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87ilj8mxq9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1669024993; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=3Kk44JZWC2K2lMsCTuP4RnbtCug7vYVNYah0tUuDni4=; b=VcwX8AyWWMxZtmLgRu6Dsd1K239QL3ng/Kzzjg9UUoEiF8UmXPlHr4CWbc564uoVNpAzVN 3ABjPHdioSyQPU4KSrbxk49/cFPOETAG9lk/MxKhMpxP4YBNL9aLqqic47gl/0IK3ktw2T 2nyKJ56vwue++lHXivyTKWBx3rXgynJhfcvvJddJh9eCKG3utg+Un8F2OrPI/4UmbeCLqC KCSo1iWrZOB9B3+9eWILguJcwtgK/ciWcE3ZbFRRd8HiPS8SNon1cgiLwKt7fMOIdZLpMo taeWpuy7LqbIyoBkAbnzmo2rdUdO50YwnvnlNoHaOZ6aaVaQlf+d9BpBdmy1ag== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1669024993; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=F3m+Sobxmk+iSmkpiDq5W+2MDiYyLL0WboTeJhT8gAbl7Xv//GGctU1DGB7BLsWW/3iJ9t fLWzUNnAtM64t4sxuvNkQ8L8uPmP1qkvCuKKprKMAggTEQTx9kiZvGXsDYRAI5eHX7mx0u OiBX9wFR395mKfTBJYheMfrPJ6f7987e/kxokKPvK36yrfqHPO7/9I/YdvKcS9jaaMieOT Hjena8L3OPS8dX/FkPXmlmIPqAbaZPlbV1VAh2affQyc6lq4H2GH03OBSib4O+rRVfBK3s h7grW7GKNWAB8Wty7P7lXuSLgwo4QpDoEx/e1jxGC8Gfx1ZlxwcfDJIK0Bzu/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=GKE092V8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.41 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=GKE092V8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7A8AF2F35B X-Spam-Score: -8.41 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: EQpH5XzuXaJl Hi! Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > Hello, > >> It would seem that a lot of aarch64 builds are queued but not >> getting processed. Any idea how to investigate that, Mathieu? > > That would be because we only had a single ARM machine available till > this week (kreuzberg). It seems that overdrive1 and grunewald are back > though! > > I also noticed that my recent remote worker fix was not working as > expected. The workers are not blocked anymore after a remote server > disconnection but some builds are flagged as submitted even though they > are not received by the worker. OK, that would explain it. >> Should we send out a call for testing the installer? Looks like >> we=E2=80=99re ready, no? > > Sure, I'll take care of that on Monday. I=E2=80=99m thinking we might as well do a proper RC1, produced by =E2=80= =9Cmake release=E2=80=9D. Maybe not today, but tomorrow we may have everything rea= dy? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.