unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: QA and armhf
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:17:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikue571w.fsf@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuQV_dEnmu_Mo7hB@jurong>

Hi Andreas,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:37 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:

> Hello,
>
> after the core-updates merge, QA is not keeping up; on
>    <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/patches>
> I see the message
>    Builds for new patch series suspended as master branch substitute
> availability is low for: armhf-linux
>
> Maybe buying new ARM machines could be part of the solution, but I also
> think that armhf (and i686) should not hold up progress of Guix, or, as it
> stands, risk the Guix quality since people end up pushing regardless of
> the QA status (if I remember well, the manual suggests a one-week waiting
> period, which right now causes frustrating busy work - create an issue,
> send the patch series if there are several commits, wait a week while
> knowing that QA will not handle the patch, push, close the issue).
> Notice that ci has already completely dropped armhf substitutes:
>    <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/master>
>
> Could we drop this suspension of QA depending on armhf and i686 weather
> status on the master branch, and only keep it for aarch64 and x86_64?
>
> Andreas

Thanks for bringing this up, as I was wondering the same (our level of
expectations for substitute coverage before merging new branches) and
sent a message now to the list about mesa-updates.

As I don't (currently) use Guix on anything but x86_64-linux, I know I
am biased in wanting to allow for more speed and momentum. However, I
worry that moving like that would risk making thing unmaintainable for
other architectures as they get left behind/have unnoticed issues,
which I wouldn't want to impose either.

So, the practical question is what we have resources for and that
users can rely on. Definitely x86_64, i686 too so far (though we are
quickly becoming the only distro), and then after...? Whatever we
decide we should clearly communicate this on the website and manual.
And if we do allow for other architectures to fall behind in coverage,
I hope that is temporary until we have more hardware to provide
similar support.

John



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-30  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-13 10:37 QA and armhf Andreas Enge
2024-09-13 10:50 ` Andreas Enge
2024-09-30  0:17 ` John Kehayias [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ikue571w.fsf@protonmail.com \
    --to=john.kehayias@protonmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@enge.fr \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).