From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GSoC status Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:48:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87ha5kgff1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738h4jkfu.fsf@gnu.org> <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd0Lx-000649-Hd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd0Ls-0003Fx-Pp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:48:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:16:11 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, "Jose E. Marchesi" , samuel.thibault@gnu.org, Thomas Schwinge Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> As you may know, we got one slot for Guix as part of the GNU >> organization for GSoC. I emailed Jos=C3=A9 and Giuseppe (who take care = of >> that on the GNU side) before going away from keyboard, telling we=E2=80= =99d like >> to have Manolis on the Hurd porting project. >> >> Somehow the message got lost. > > FWIW, I received that message (dated Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:28:54 +0200), > as I was on the CC list. In fact, I received two copies of it. > > I see that it was also sent to Thomas Schwinge, Samuel Thibault, Richard > Braun, Andreas Enge, and Nikita Karetnikov. It would be interesting to > know which of the recipients saw the message, and how it got lost. Giuseppe mentioned receiving it too. >> The lesson is that I should have been more cautious. Probably that >> process would be best handled by a group of people. > > We must keep in mind that email is no longer reliable, given the > widespread use of aggressive and heuristic spam filtering today. Yeah. :-/ Ludo=E2=80=99.