[PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[Alex Kost]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

The license for the Liberation fonts.  I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
it be just ‘silofl’?  Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
or "SILOFL 1.1" or something else?


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-licenses-Add-silofl1.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1080 bytes --]

From ef66e2f801d5b54bb16074bea747888e6ed4e5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:38:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

* guix/licenses.scm (silofl1.1): New variable.
---
 guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index 8b7ea53..3f1e8b0 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
             psfl public-domain
             qpl
             ruby
+            silofl1.1
             vim
             x11 x11-style
             zlib
@@ -267,6 +268,11 @@ which may be a file:// URI pointing the package's tree."
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Ruby"
            "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/license.txt"))
 
+(define silofl1.1
+  (license "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
+           "http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web"
+           "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#SILOFL"))
+
 (define vim
   (license "Vim"
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Vim7.2"
-- 
2.1.2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> The license for the Liberation fonts.  I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
> it be just ‘silofl’?

‘silofl1.1’ sounds good.

> Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1" or "SILOFL 1.1" or
> something else?

Maybe “SIL OFL 1.1”?  Most license objects use the abbreviation in the
‘name’ field already, so that’d be consistent with those.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[Alex Kost]

Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-28 11:08 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> The license for the Liberation fonts.  I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
>> it be just ‘silofl’?
>
> ‘silofl1.1’ sounds good.
>
>> Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1" or "SILOFL 1.1" or
>> something else?
>
> Maybe “SIL OFL 1.1”?  Most license objects use the abbreviation in the
> ‘name’ field already, so that’d be consistent with those.  :-)

Thanks, I'll change it.  OK to push after that?  (I hope it wouldn't
conflict with anything this time :-))

Re: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-28 11:08 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> The license for the Liberation fonts.  I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
>>> it be just ‘silofl’?
>>
>> ‘silofl1.1’ sounds good.
>>
>>> Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1" or "SILOFL 1.1" or
>>> something else?
>>
>> Maybe “SIL OFL 1.1”?  Most license objects use the abbreviation in the
>> ‘name’ field already, so that’d be consistent with those.  :-)
>
> Thanks, I'll change it.  OK to push after that?  (I hope it wouldn't
> conflict with anything this time :-))

OK!

Ludo'.