From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: problem with building gcc-cross-4.8.3 for i686-pc-gnu Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:38:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9v04jon.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54CCADF7.6090708@gmail.com> <54CD5372.5090103@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJLhx-0001rz-85 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 07:39:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJLht-0001Pz-DL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 07:38:56 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJLht-0001Pv-B6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 07:38:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54CD5372.5090103@gmail.com> (Marek Benc's message of "Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:13:06 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Marek Benc Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Marek Benc skribis: > The attached patch does the following: > 1.) Adds the name of the dynamic linker to gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm > 2.) Adds code to gnu/package/gcc to substitute the default dynamic > linker in gcc/config/arch/gnu.h for the one to be used. > 3.) Changes how the build system arguments for cross-gcc are created: > A.) They're now in a separate procedure, reflecting how it's done > in vanilla guix. > B.) A bug is fixed that caused the native ld.so to be picked over > the target one. > C.) Fixed the 'set-cross-path phase so that it also checks for > hurd-related packages, and checks package existence before passing > anything to the string-handling functions. This all looks good to me. However, this should really be 5 different patches so as to ease review, bisection, etc. Could you do that? Please prefer one message per patch, as with =E2=80=98git send-email=E2=80= =99. TIA! Ludo=E2=80=99.