Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-16 18:50 +0300) wrote: > Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > >> For the typos and polishing fixes, I would prefer that the commits were >> done in a module related way. So IMO It would be better to have one >> commit per-file. > > I think one per file would be overkill (and not really helpful > review-wise.) One per fix would be nice though: one commit for bullet > lists, one for typos, etc. > > But I understand it would be boring to do that now that you’ve come up > with that big patch, so either way is fine with me. Making several patches is not a problem, and I agree on separating a patch for lists (especially since there is no agreement on this question), as for the rest: trailing spaces, single spaces between sentences, missing periods in the end of sentences and typos seem the same things for me. So I'm attaching 2 patches: for lines with leading parenthesis and for fixing multiple "typos" (in a general meaning). Changing synopses/descriptions according to "guix lint" (so no problems with 'gnu-description') and reorganizing lists are not included.