From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: file-systems: Allow for bind mounting regular
	files.
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:06:15 +0300
Message-ID: <87h9obshlk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87a8uarf6g.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87bnepriup.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAJ=RwfbgKQ=3yetHsEpGFdSaHhAazYozQ3Mv5fR=VYS0uvObGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ=Rwfa5fZOP2eC-NBv01J_NmbK5UFX7m7F=LK6JdjeL4F4eBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87si804jzt.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAJ=RwfZGrfx3asxAu1B4R2QqThWiVneBk1rxC7E9b49JOOge=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46215)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZNbjU-0005KS-0b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:06:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZNbjQ-0005An-Ro
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:06:23 -0400
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]:33367)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZNbjQ-0005Ac-JK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:06:20 -0400
Received: by labjt7 with SMTP id jt7so44900359lab.0
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfZGrfx3asxAu1B4R2QqThWiVneBk1rxC7E9b49JOOge=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	(David Thompson's message of "Thu, 6 Aug 2015 08:22:59 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Thompson, David (2015-08-06 15:22 +0300) wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thompson, David (2015-08-02 15:51 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, of course, I forgot about something:  This patch triggers a
>>> rebuild of *everything* now!  I guess it should be applied to
>>> core-updates.  Or, the first patch I submitted can be applied to
>>> master, and then a patch that moves 'regular-file?' to (guix build
>>> utils) can be applied to core-updates later.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> In my opinion it is redundant to use another commit here, so I would
>> apply this patch to core-updates (taking into account Andreas' note).
>> But I don't really know how such situations are handled.  Mark should
>> know better.
>
> The reason I want two commits is strategic.  This first patch can go
> into master *now*, without breaking anything or causing a full
> rebuild.  Moving that procedure into (guix build utils) is nice, but
> not strictly necessary.  I am trying to get basic container support in
> shape and into master.  Waiting on a core-updates cycle would just
> stall the process.

Ah, OK, I don't mind then.

-- 
Alex