From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MOSAIK.
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:50:07 +0100
Message-ID: <87h9lctiog.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <idjziziyg36.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87a8reyhz0.fsf@gnu.org> <20151023080219.GB7097@debian>
	<idjeggmx9fa.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<20151027134249.00f6d318@debian-netbook>
	<idj611s79vn.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56063)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Zr6Vq-0003e4-Bu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:50:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Zr6Vl-000555-Ks
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:50:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <idj611s79vn.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's
	message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:51:08 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

[...]

>> I ran `./pre-inst-env guix build -s i686-linux mosaik` and the build fai=
led for me.
>
> I can confirm this.  Too bad.  The reason is that =E2=80=9Cssw.c=E2=80=9D=
 uses macros
> from emmintrin.h that are always inlined.  Inlining fails here due to
> =E2=80=9Ctarget specific option mismatch=E2=80=9D.
>
> Does this only happen when cross-compiling or will this also happen if
> it=E2=80=99s built natively on i686?

It happens natively: The -s above does a native build (for
cross-compilation, it=E2=80=99s --target, which must be passed a full GNU
triplet.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.