From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: Adding tags to packages Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:02:44 +0300 Message-ID: <87h9ivxcgb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <568828EF.7050406@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFeYt-0002Br-KD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 04:02:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFeYo-0001n7-Ks for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 04:02:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <568828EF.7050406@gnu.org> (Fabio Pesari's message of "Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:45:51 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabio Pesari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Fabio Pesari (2016-01-02 22:45 +0300) wrote: > Sorry to bump an old thread but I agree with the OP that tags in > packages would be very helpful, and I can think of at least one use case > in which they might be necessary: games. I also think tags may be useful (especially searching by tags). In the worst case it will do no harm. If you don't want to use tags, you can ignore them. -- Alex