From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reorganizing guix package commands
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:16:25 +0300
Message-ID: <87h9exj43q.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <874mazi99k.fsf@gmail.com> <877ffual6i.fsf@gnu.org>
	<877ffujasf.fsf@gmail.com> <5715F91F.5030800@crazy-compilers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35855)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1asShq-0006fm-OY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:16:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1asShn-0002gM-3K
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:16:30 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]:36120)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1asShm-0002g3-SC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:16:27 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id j10so1845878lfg.3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 03:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5715F91F.5030800@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message
	of "Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:23:43 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hartmut Goebel (2016-04-19 12:23 +0300) wrote:

> Am 19.04.2016 um 09:52 schrieb Alex Kost:
>
> I like you suggestion, except for these:
>> Here is the summary of the changes I think it would be good to have:
>>
>> [...]
>> |-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------|
>> | guix package --list-generations   | guix profile --list-generations   |
>
> Why no replace the dashes here, too? This would IMHO be more consistent
> to the package sub-command?

I agree, especially taking into account that there is "guix system
list-generations".  Then the same should probably be done with other
things (list-installed, roll-back, ...)

-- 
Alex