From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +0000
Message-ID: <87h9a8ucqw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160825030933.06c8d523@gmail.com>
	<87inup42zl.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87wpj5gpeg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87oa4hgodk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35130)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bcvwD-0007Ny-06
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:47:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bcvwA-0004ua-ED
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:47:24 -0400
Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:58133
	helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bcvwA-0004uP-4h
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:47:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87oa4hgodk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: gno <gnopap@gmail.com>, guix-devel@gnu.org

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

>> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9).
>
> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
> awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
> • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@)
> • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2)
> • D-Bus support: ✔

Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for
obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening is
something we need to watch in the future ;)

> Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix,
> but why do we not have it in awesome? 
> And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even know why
> I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either way.

-- 
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org