From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add denemo.
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:07:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87h96asukd.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87r35ikzjw.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87eg1g7p8n.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87twaciipd.fsf@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41778)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cG0bQ-0006c3-G0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 04:39:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cG0bP-0002I3-Q2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 04:39:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <87twaciipd.fsf@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> writes:

> Indeed it is not. I've removed these inputs from the new patch. As a
> side note, lilypond was required as a runtime dependency so I moved it
> to propagated-inputs.

Do you think it would be possible to patch the sources to refer to the
Lilypond executable instead of propagating the input?

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
http://elephly.net