From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Time to build =?utf-8?B?4oCYc3RhZ2luZ+KAmSE=?= Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:30:33 -0500 Message-ID: <87h96a9sbq.fsf@netris.org> References: <87wpff7le8.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg1nbq6f.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161204181134.GB2892@jasmine> <87y3zm1f86.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG9pW-0005X0-3U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:30:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG9pS-0007f4-LK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:30:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y3zm1f86.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:40:41 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 05:43:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >>>=20 >>> > Hi Guix! >>> > >>> > It=E2=80=99s time to merge master into staging and build it! >>> > >>> > Leo, Marius: thoughts? Since you=E2=80=99re the one who did most of = the work >>> > there, I suggest that you do this (Leo has access to Hydra). >>>=20 >>> I just did a master merge and picked the mupdf update. I think it's good >>> to go! :-) >> >> I've created a staging jobset and asked Hydra to evaluate it: >> >> https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/staging > > It would seem to be ready to merge: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109391?compare=3Dmaster#tabs-now-fail > > The few remaining failures on x86_64 seem to be transient. There are > more failures on mips, part of which is due to massive test failures in > Subversion (see > ), which look > fishy. > > I=E2=80=99d be in favor of merging now though. > > What do people think? Sounds fine to me. Thanks, Mark