From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Is font-google-noto toooooo big as a font package?
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:36:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87h8y8maep.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87pod1z1id.fsf@163.com> <87r2xf5fck.fsf@gnu.org>
	<31124b25.a25c.15d50edf50d.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
	<87pocy12jy.fsf@gnu.org> <20170718124017.udjqs4m4fo7evyjt@abyayala>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49870)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dXvi1-0002G0-Fb
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:36:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dXvhw-0004Ag-Ja
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:36:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170718124017.udjqs4m4fo7evyjt@abyayala>
	(ng0@infotropique.org's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:40:17 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: tumashu <tumashu@163.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.2K bytes:
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> tumashu <tumashu@163.com> skribis:
>>=20
>> > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package =
easy
>>=20
>> Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split
>> it, which may not be that simple.
>>=20
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>>=20
>>=20
> noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends:
> https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk
> noto itself is offered on the website in many different
> blends aswell:
> https://www.google.com/get/noto/

So maybe we could make the CJK part a different output or a different
package?

Ludo=E2=80=99.