From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYc3RhZ2luZ+KAmQ==?= branch Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:50:02 -0400 Message-ID: <87h8vwtgnp.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87o9q756qo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lrxb43x.fsf@fastmail.com> <87lgl8u9eu.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duzzs-0004p2-Of for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:50:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duzzn-0001eF-Vf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:50:24 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duzzn-0001e6-Pt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:50:19 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E887720E69 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:50:16 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87lgl8u9eu.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:28:57 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kei Kebreau writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> Marius, what=E2=80=99s the status of =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99? (Sorry= I had to pick someone as >>> the staging master, so to speak. :-)) >> >> I've shepherded the last few iterations, so I guess it's only fair! >> >> I was waiting for Keis "monster" patch from #27898, but if we are to >> merge this before 'core-updates' we'll have to start building it now. >> >> Tangentially, there's also the Python 3.6 update. Maybe we can just >> toss it at 'core-updates', WDYT? >> >> @Kei: Feel free to push the patch to 'staging' if you can. If it >> doesn't make it until tomorrow, it will probably have to wait until the >> next 'core-updates' is merged :/ >> > > I've updated and attached the patch over the past few hours. I haven't > tested by building each affected package, so I'm not sure whether it's > okay to push. > >>> Wouldn=E2=80=99t it be nice to merge master in staging, and then merge = staging >>> real soon? >> >> I've done the first part. Will start it tomorrow, unless there are >> objections. Barring any objections, I'll be pushing in about an hour. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlnDp2oACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg1DCQ/+L7NxPJeGgo9+pRDMjgPqHWoI0t+gVI/b5nD5lCgcZbsd9UW1/oy9sLcs IZSOWpxHm7Pb+XDXPz6X3h7S76ulYqdMH2z/RGfn9ma6I8xTWqQlPrFxvBR7R7Sx Px5yMSibC15Ibulue10xjdQdZ/m7nnBlugHorDoXGZJ4hDubt0GORMg9IlBJxUBb xBRykrPnSP091h1OnEXHeDfjzN8ka/IltaGiGZhkiQcaqs4gvviPETqAJqSpnz8n VHBmUa8iSsbqSu3/G4uixk8Uj+mt6VzSDVRW/wbiIgdDjq5pkKqFNo2NU6hxkfJN miimok9vE5q7M7pZL/utFQAwE92tuVryuY+RzNESMEK85B6s1ewdG9N15hdIAfhz 0wNa15TFYcSXKks+XErfheSfw5NxvRMPwaCAgb9aeWWS3I4qlSTsbG2T4bNDaY0B XkmCGv6FmdobkG+FjEqN6OS/iZlJiT7PRflEOlSqH0ScS3H8RGNpn+UNQMLIx9uZ ACUpgE2D1xo5p2JfWkafMQRlKsAuwkSZblUfx36BQJtIfTsOKhz7fIs9ieH0AH84 +Qu0m8tWnuc/KXzig6D4YfAHXpRBVqdkuWmePfFxugF6f4Un5MjnD2L/8e6qf1CS 4VyXRKR6BBuiKgFy6B2EoSok4wkMu9urd2K4lsXyrkS9z0P3U0o= =o4UL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--