From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:42:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87h84jgpdh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsZd-0004Go-9o for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:42:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsZb-0000pz-MA for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:42:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Guix-devel Cc: GNU Guix maintainers --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On a side note: why is the list of maintainers numbered? Is there a hierarchy? If not, maybe the list should be itemized instead and sorted alphabetically (or whatever order makes sense). =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2cvIoACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH+1nwf/cnqcvwdE627Z08MtcLuWFa22Ny4ntQogSEDSH4/C62XqG/f/sYNPssXX zmWFR4+np8F1c30T1L9TB894r4NcVWWMzIYjzAa2wdrKPmG+M395Zj0OjxIbesWK Kc4jVimuhI0SXyWhA/sFwF8K2hBzLxwnP3qe6n56F+OQdop+PImCSuIu168JUWrc iuN7Cjh4FH+Hkv5/kgCjNUgbl18mtspjqpNKdHdh4G5QnGOdTzykM6In6I+6dmPV 75NKlvZRIzJg3g0HmRSifVBOPEB6JR9NFDxsraJFdsqfiZY/dYYrf9qVJO8kQCIs c3yrXxlQ/7NJ0Ndzrw634Eq9Nv3O9A== =07w3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--