From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Parallel downloads
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:11:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87h83n76pm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87pnid3qdh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86lfsz52sx.fsf@dismail.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57925)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcKF-0000TI-2w
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:11:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcKB-00033O-BU
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:11:10 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:58531)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcKB-000333-5b
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:11:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <86lfsz52sx.fsf@dismail.de>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Joshua Branson <jbranso@dismail.de>, guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Joshua Branson <jbranso@dismail.de> writes:

> On a related note, would getting guix to download substitutes via IPFS
> mean that one could update one's system faster?=20

As of November 2019, no, IPFS is still too slow.  In the future, maybe :)

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl28g0UACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+2FAf9GlQn50dE/m4bSMSgq4D8wTaK7Ptoh08BnQvhcIA9JXS1oiASCW2442R9
5a8a+51abb1/LNYoyP1IVd4GwZt1Im/4+CybI6pK1+Fk5MnuQY1cB4eM4F+dAN2G
kvThYkO6nSL5vjr/vqnhTRm/zbanpOToTKO+RgoqPvdSZvzFXHSCCcdbsWJPEMPv
ZFCRidK8qwpWkXiTYlTK6kuOPZRyfK0ZBZovBYP7rUV2SpW4erhExtXiQjaQPQqy
ovWur11CgdtoCpVGLTgv9IMBLGgQn485wrPGnnP6VzYlwacZvsbtRkltXYGQ71yC
+iB0gjge9gvwIPQrpCfR7p9TVzQI4A==
=Ia80
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--