Vincent,

Vincent Legoll 写道：
> I'm not seeing any size difference, but groff is not in the 
> output:

There's some deeper confusion here: why do you expect the size to 
change, at all?

Making ‘groff’ native was the right thing to do (and please, keep 
fixing bugs like this! :-) but it has nothing to do with making 
packages smaller.

Kind regards,

T G-R