From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2JPRIbZm615bHwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:05:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kE3NHbZm615ZNwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:05:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDFB94038E for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jluEv-0007Wm-8x for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:05:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jluEn-0007We-I8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:05:49 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:7571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jluEl-0002Mt-8j; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:05:49 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,526,1583190000"; d="scan'208";a="352001523" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jun 2020 15:05:42 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9CReproducible?= research articles, from source code to =?utf-8?Q?PDF=E2=80=9D?= References: <87d05ztcxj.fsf@inria.fr> <864kraxjau.fsf@gmail.com> <87k104omnv.fsf@inria.fr> <87r1ucmwh5.fsf@inria.fr> <86lfkkwn0l.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 1 Messidor an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:05:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86lfkkwn0l.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:56:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7v8le1l.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.104; envelope-from=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; helo=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/18 09:05:44 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -68 X-Spam_score: -6.9 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel , Konrad Hinsen , guix-hpc@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: 6YfAHjwEHkAd zimoun skribis: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 13:42, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >>> I'd start somewhat differently: generate diverse use case examples. The >>> contributions to the ReScience reproducibility challenge could be a nice >>> starting point: go through them, one by one, and try to re-implement the >>> authors' various approaches with Guix. Then, in a second step, try to >>> identify additional tooling support in Guix that would make the recipes >>> simpler to implement. That might well lead to the development of ready >>> to use templates, but I prefer starting from a use case analysis to see >>> what is needed in real life. >> >> Yes, sounds like a good plan! > > Maybe we could organize a Virtual Hackathon? Over 1 day? Or 2 days? > The power of collective motivation. :-) Sounds like a good idea! Perhaps a one-day hackathon to begin with? Early July maybe? Ludo=E2=80=99.