From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cEDSCTedsl91fwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:39:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +HO7BTedsl8TLgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:39:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB4D9401BF for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kegbN-00042w-N1 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:39:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kegbD-00041c-PJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:39:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]:34012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kegb8-0005x1-Ap; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:39:23 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id r17so19189327wrw.1; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:39:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=yFeqBgfQDHlmUxqarfkiKnMIZlFZs0CnOKSs8F2ygVI=; b=I8aAosEGghlbzCEUtgABOcVG3hq0Df4arnGup+Fqzl+78msYawUKEs3GGZ+M89lO8Y 7s8i62tFP913nphzATQWLlsoJgdkGMuw0T5pj6OQjYgWYfYW9tzeib76bCaeKdBZTLNa dBN+q4hPynf/2rHu3/0jnLWVAdGKxMLXzzbpGTSVsp7EmaQtSBF5kLiqAk5enWKnDWMC y/pJc5UQCbGKkBimourttpV3vSPSRJHI0MHrUE1TQaAzcfgEouTalDT/z0QAXtTixhkI x1jjdP1Qi4q1BNtrliXArMT+kn7TyzCDfXEbP0r4xt6MquvJz+7DI9jmhteMpz455Za1 vNyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yFeqBgfQDHlmUxqarfkiKnMIZlFZs0CnOKSs8F2ygVI=; b=Z7tJr9eGhuF2BjiF0pJUFdeDPug2yMPGBNfNUBg8aZXHchQ7p8KUOIDc0CILq7JZWl wocnMT9Q0BqWUR29oZ+9yZPS3UPrmKck/dylb9/ygs+4KnlDYm/vUOzUU86yNgKvm67T J9pIpcBNVIbydQL/ysKLUE1bFhfAQdmnY4u5fBPzmI9+RIc22dXWuFbMI+k+0UFA7+yB ezarWdQ+t1tP+jnZ+VAntzUuIS3oRYi0EE82jn0wphKNE1pQfthkJ7DEdGVE96n0/7zx ZqY4ZZy3C58XLIu8IyKwnIeTby77LbcoSWWjDZz21D/iCYtBbcD2KIyNgBzl8iRTryPV DkMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JY4OzWci5ZeA0s2TB8byhSjzBGPhaO1bv+Pm0fy9WTw1bcmKI O7F6reb/toZeQUSQ2NBUyH12bodjh0KiKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeNTMWR2ikLCQHA0T4Up7Vh0JOVlvfWFaDmWsldM0mOoKl8DbXBZvC2OT58AkoavuIN1pq+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6743:: with SMTP id l3mr19753759wrw.82.1605541155736; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from unfall (20.134.94.90.dynamic.jazztel.es. [90.94.134.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm20326199wmg.19.2020.11.16.07.39.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:39:14 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Miguel_=C3=81ngel_Arruga_Vivas?= To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: Re: GNU Guix 1.2.0rc1 available for testing! References: <87d00hchij.fsf@gnu.org> <20201115191618.zuvkz65o3kcahfoz@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874klqb82u.fsf@gnu.org> <20201115231643.7mslq2sjzliv4nfd@pelzflorian.localdomain> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:39:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201115231643.7mslq2sjzliv4nfd@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:16:43 +0100") Message-ID: <87h7ppxqe6.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=rosen644835@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42b.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=I8aAosEG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: LWnD8eVjM+Rs Hallo, Leute! "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:53:29PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> I have just installed a system using manual partitioning through the >> installer, with encryption. Everything worked like a charm. [...] > Maybe it depends on how fast the machine completes a formatting task? > So I tried again two more times and it failed again, I got the error > again both times during partition formatting. [...] > I assume some formatting step had not completed in time. >From your log, the format didn't even took place, as it is the following step from run-partitioning-page (at gnu/installer/newt/partition.scm), but it was writing the partitions to the disk. I think this comment from free-parted (at gnu/installer/parted.scm) tells the same problem you're hitting: ----------------------------------8<-------------------------------------- ;; XXX: Formatting and further operations on disk partition table may fail ;; because the partition table changes are not synced, or because the device ;; is still in use, even if parted should have finished editing ;; partitions. This is not well understood, but syncing devices and waiting ;; them to stop returning EBUSY to BLKRRPART ioctl seems to be enough. The ;; same kind of issue is described here: ;; https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2013-March/msg18423.html. ---------------------------------->8-------------------------------------- Nonetheless, we're only waiting 1 second + processing time to timeout the lookup for EBUSY at 'with-delay-device-in-use?'. Should we extend that timeout? I don't think waiting even minutes at this stage would be a big issue, as formatting an encrypted partition may take hours and will be performed just after that. WDYT? Happy hacking! Miguel