From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ALeiFJNE+1/SIwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:16:51 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kCxlEJNE+18oCgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:16:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4ED9403AE for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48122 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfGk-0001r3-3m for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:16:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfGY-0001qu-63 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:16:38 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:50022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfGV-0003Xp-Dk; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:16:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=/LPz9lzbvi/kQVSrdPVVW9FruB4xdc1JUGnz96KcAFc=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=n36jXVk07DwmK9z6ay915p+AG7Dez5CjejeLj ZsikNv2RqJjZs0lAWs01TRSDJoE7FUEiukjlTLdt30f/kBQHM8LsgH/mMgVwKGcTAZV5cS RN7OtIdgsZnBwjGRC54HV0/ZtXyGd7uOpLUiwSIUYfotV4mIcuM56GD+AsNbJWN4f+v9Qz 7GnH3Vocic6GBmmIpRunH6xRZODxPwpNLyoi0RTk2FUrSLexiiUVmjRF/ZjIGGwSZ9pIPx 2EvlC78JQ8W0s77HT5ubFiY2qsqxS/doAxtTKTEOS7sLq6+Hjc1xxX5koIVrgn9pkMoLmk fYp0qvK7XqVt0qlXeYXDd3jbA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 15b65d12 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:17:00 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Luis Felipe , Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Cuirass logo - artwork. References: <87bldzu64t.fsf@gnu.org> <8IQXp0MGh8RPw3OizFH2VEwKOdLJR_SJosbTT2z2nJFdzpIlrXHx7CPoHC-_hKt9AjXKfej1XAgLEj18wFmoVWRxPBUKLF20JuLY_Nh6w5E=@protonmail.com> In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:15:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7nopsju.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.65 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=n36jXVk0; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1B4ED9403AE X-Spam-Score: -4.65 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: BVbiH9hbqKrv --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luis, Mathieu, Luis Felipe via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System=20 distribution. =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Here is my proposal: > > https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/media/2021/01/cuirass-logo-proposal-2021-01= -09.png Like the others I prefer the orange/black colour scheme. It=20 integrates better with other Guix sites & the other one has less=20 positive connotiations. Row B's =E2=80=98S=E2=80=99 just looks off; I prefer C's. Is this a stock= =20 typeface? I see =E2=80=98integration=E2=80=99 in the logo but not in =E2=80=98//=E2= =80=99. The logo comes frustratingly close to =E2=80=98CI=E2=80=99 whilst (to my ey= e)=20 trying very hard not to :-) A bit like the name =E2=80=98Cuirass=E2=80=99.= Where=20 did that come from, Mathieu? Thanks for drawing these up so swiftly! T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX/tENQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW153ZoBAJnf7y6xtl+QCHZXM4G9NCsx3uRkZdk+arPrDYLt L2iiAQDvpUtLd0uo6xbAYksud6WQDAOFf3zBegOC1w9FReiUAQ== =SZmP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--