Efraim Flashner writes: > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-3.0)[arguments]: On powerpc add two > phases to adjust for 32-bit big-endian systems. > --- > gnu/packages/guile.scm | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm > index f63322794d..dca1b1c16f 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm > @@ -305,7 +305,26 @@ without requiring the source code to be rewritten.") > (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments guile-2.2) > ((#:configure-flags flags ''()) > `(cons "--disable-jit" ,flags))) > - (package-arguments guile-2.2))) > + (if (string-prefix? "powerpc-" (%current-system)) > + (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments guile-2.2) > + ((#:phases phases) > + `(modify-phases ,phases > + (add-after 'unpack 'adjust-bootstrap-flags > + (lambda _ > + ;; Upstream not yet notified about suggested solution. > + ;; See existing bug reports: > + ;; https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45214 > + ;; https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977223 > + (substitute* "bootstrap/Makefile.in" > + (("^GUILE_OPTIMIZATIONS.*") > + "GUILE_OPTIMIZATIONS = -O1 -Oresolve-primitives -Ocps\n")) > + #t)) > + (add-after 'unpack 'remove-failing-tests > + (lambda _ > + ;; TODO: Discover why this test fails on powerpc-linux > + (delete-file "test-suite/standalone/test-out-of-memory") > + #t))))) > + (package-arguments guile-2.2)))) > (native-search-paths > (list (search-path-specification > (variable "GUILE_LOAD_PATH") Generally this looks reasonable. I understand 3 weeks is a long iteration time! I think it's OK to proceed if it works for bootstrapping other software on this platform. Especially since the change is isolated to just powerpc-linux. Has the Guile test failure been reported upstream? -- Chris