From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id KHBrLqzDSWTEuAAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:00 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id uHFSLqzDSWT/1wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:00 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00F32D666 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prpCE-0006Gq-58; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:09:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prpC8-0006GV-4o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:09:12 -0400 Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prpC4-0006up-RP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:09:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KXuwWF2RWQVOes5g6omT8l0aex8qs9EOBsIHZ6SGUJc=; b=TfVknHPRRVYi4QOfddly9ixoGt KXWzxrDAtyMHrk+GiJlomdujCFz6htJqLUB05UxugOSrOC42Pp76J2v0X8xtqcc9KL1LCwXz1XsSE f7r5Ku7ztVCm8ydXkTyKoNrg+CozFY4nsvD1OIIA0JsIdx5TwHITWzqJ12//ImOJqAiPraZbyx13H ab1AD/jxL9/CfBMxB7PPGM70UQOFs2EmBG318oZ0FJxMLBbLohNbr4nElbRGG095zQPsQEpgLeP2g yFOxuX/EoAL/pZULxM7zvuCDsPdXNKGVse5TEmA87otnNuDDR8HknBsakI4Jy2dTbZwHMM7UksyjQ jX1qi4PA==; Received: from [192.168.2.1] (port=42548 helo=localhost) by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1prpBw-0005WC-1M; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:08:57 +0100 From: Arun Isaac To: John Kehayias Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: `mumi send-email' means no more debbugs dance to send multiple patches In-Reply-To: <87h6t25o7p.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <87mt2xiab3.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87h6t25o7p.fsf@protonmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:08:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6t2gpa2.fsf@systemreboot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=139.59.75.54; envelope-from=arunisaac@systemreboot.net; helo=mugam.systemreboot.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1682555820; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BZJL0641MNziRRs2p/TWKqfLCQqGqtVIOULF6j1wUW5PpTthkxbiLueQ0n9lJsdsZN0TtS ISZHDDrPBHjvUIlNltYWgVD4wwgbrSGgZY0tyWvTT9PhCw/8zpuDBZ6lbRheqz8rGaOaMf +zSvROjwRwpaq40sDfETAiU12yNqSi9G9PlUHskVMg6aks/SHWhSO7N1XRnegqXDxfoz/E MUYwYmd6mBnp9g8e8WQkQH33v9hZFD3clX7MeCIbm0YDqYHuN6AACIyoDFExTTStNcQ+LH F9dwgx1P4mjDfwnAvo58wi54AmFMzuq4VQh4m34gPnL9FareZgC5ZKuFuEmevw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b=TfVknHPR; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1682555820; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KXuwWF2RWQVOes5g6omT8l0aex8qs9EOBsIHZ6SGUJc=; b=gVmyKUZobV4sb8xdjsqyDFBXjB3+IGpu9rtnE8W1+0Ejq/KKraeZULgwTPl6eAI2VgkV32 dX6vcp5JOlb5lHCY9/EIqj9aNPk69RWNLE+YO/MO9AV2xcHShR57B5beTHzPBbYIpzFRKU oZU4BS/r1DOiwJzi2GxQtF3zoLGotbJMnieY1Gebr+7B2C31FK3MxNA2vEfZpBtPOXCqWo UP1w41jX0wO34Ke1x7AJ8JF4y7j9kmKo0o1qfbuMg95R2IGNmQNgKLIgWViBaSeFCYMra2 yayg5cVbzJqSsuoAUBaqo3IVH1DKkVDCA4EWZHA7TlZ3Z2vXa9d5x8Z3mgr/NA== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.39 X-Spam-Score: 0.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A00F32D666 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b=TfVknHPR; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: p1V5tcrW/s20 Hi John, > I just tried it out and it worked smoothly for sending 2 patches to an > existing bug. However, it was sent only directly to the bug address, > not being aware I guess of anyone that had submitted or since been > CC'ed to the thread. > > Is there anything we can do here? I learned about the useful "wide > reply" when using debbugs in Emacs and presumably mumi can/does know > about all addresses on the bug. So hopefully this wishlist item won't > be too difficult. This is definitely a nice feature to have. For now, I put in the other addresses as Cc when creating the patch using `git format-patch'. Should we build this feature into `mumi send-email' or should we create a separate `mumi format-patch' command that will create a patch with the correct Cc and with other necessary options passed to `git format-patch'? The other necessary options (think options like `-1 -a --base=auto' as recommended in the Guix manual at "(guix) Sending a Patch Series") could be configured in .mumi/config allowing different projects using mumi to recommend different options. Either way, patches to mumi are always welcome! ;-) Regards, Arun