From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id uDmdKt/OpWT+IgAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 22:13:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id iOmBKt/OpWQzAwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 22:13:19 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD21856C for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qH8rk-0002ZT-HO; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 16:12:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qH8rZ-0002Yq-8b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 16:12:34 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qH8rX-0005t2-10 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2023 16:12:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 20:12:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1688587940; x=1688847140; bh=O/piQfFRToiFF8Jsy0ObjuLGEC9F3mRcU0U6jkNd01U=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=YPEgs8rsab509ciVdIFG224ZDUZjIBYwfrMvxEcoutMBD6P2lKtySh/msDJJ2kzdS EtY33/SvVTZhG/svdo1P7E+3IjCBC5sHcVbrx1mg08lNcczwXRpYg6zdFrDYSoHZMG E0+hlI18Yxyrq9Id0KtttfZ0LS0uPvnGiMJSUV4j5XY4RLXPCEUpts0zMxWQjmeaRp pWsADbDI1UVHG5loi7P/m+d9JeQpQ08HbnZN4NI13ETLRF5CDzxtQISZtcIeUWIokB w8l4/g4uo+8X1qHqG4Quuxi97bQfxt3+PpRnX7KbBE6bracEe9OBQ2gSmay8YD7Yo4 hemMZ/o5S8WFg== To: Andreas Enge From: John Kehayias Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates Message-ID: <87h6qiktig.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87y1kfqphd.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1688587999; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WEs2C0WVlk9SmANPkhCMPm4xaxQn9bBJNRNfp/yJt5N0mGgGJZgONSNmV7wmdo86HCOK1c mo2AvPND+4o0tsLIMtxqvkonFIXbuE0AQUPzdxWgLzW+dHnG0HNxlIWv7wV+ke7oSBHflJ yjT+QJFhzqy5+quozzUYlq6xODkXVZAZebwvpN+Z75/UPmvu/sy3QTw6Whmw/DDSwYwegH Kr5pmjcduomyTI/vYCXjBUXysCSkNX33YPx8xFY4T+UUvJ7qo4IEFuEr/blyz+R6eTkAxs 3WMHQIxxCWQ8DBtDe7poLt/WC3SM3OkEGAwNPtkYHhOj/59e7ESXcUjCrZPrWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=YPEgs8rs; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1688587999; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=O/piQfFRToiFF8Jsy0ObjuLGEC9F3mRcU0U6jkNd01U=; b=E6C77G1JILjVjr7E7qtHCTEKx07b594GHzn8+xi6nE8smVt+lBsMo00FbkbLiM4cXhS9qe i3JXs08Hp7wUe9M+F9rwFti7O6uycQmR/yjL/HFi+bjVPUd5F+fBoEitrkRRI1QlhI28hA cmWir5liZdiXlMX4/G/u3XqroGeUfohGU73LcrQAhk3SATHQ3DzpErae3j6xUM/YNu4dNU uJ91uF6+S4CbwAtv5h0Jo8X2rRo/wmwPHWmv9pV/lp+adoL5kqfqouaScnhqUoznI3dG5x 8ukMikVwRxR+aY8qzWNM3ZlTMKSmeu5vM4gtZrw3O4hxhwGpGRARR5bK4EABpA== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=YPEgs8rs; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -11.48 X-Spam-Score: -11.48 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8DD21856C X-TUID: 7D5ke5Z2/pza Hello, On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:08 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Am Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:47:06AM -0600 schrieb Katherine Cox-Buday: >> I disagree with this because it seems like Mesa moves along at a pretty >> brisk pace and I feel like we'd be constantly recreating the same branch= : >> 23.1.3, 2023-06-22 (14 days) >> 23.1.2, 2023-06-08 ( 9 days) >> 23.0.4, 2023-05-30 ( 5 days) >> 23.1.1, 2023-05-25 (15 days) >> 23.1.0, 2023-05-10 > > I doubt we would be able to move at such a brisk pace and update mesa > every other week! It is a package with more than 4000 dependents, so in > any case it would be good to regroup with somewhat related changes. > Since the Cuirass job remains, I don't think it is really any extra work or not to recreate the branch as needed, if that is preferred. I'll defer to whatever people want, we can always change our mind if anything comes up. As for the pace, on the main 23.1.x releases we see about 2 weeks currently. If that is a bit fast I think about once a month is a reasonable pace, maybe depending if it is a small bugfix release or what other changes we may need causing other rebuilds to be grouped on the branch. We can slow down if major changes are introduced, but seems Mesa is moving along without breaking changes or major changes in building/support these days. As you can follow along on within a couple of days x86_64 and i686 had good weather (though I can't see specifically what may have broken yet) while as we'd expect things like aarch64 are still churning away. The speed of this build job might determine how fast we can go anyway, but waiting too long will mean a new minor release to build :) John