Re: ActtivityPub and Haunt

[Munyoki Kilyungi <me@bonfacemunyoki.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1350 bytes --]

Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
aliandika:

> indieterminacy <indieterminacy@libre.brussels> writes:
>
>> As can be imagined, some of these softwares have stacks which Guix is
>> not so usually adept at packaging.
>
> As a side note, I suspect the major paint point of *all* of these
> systems, which is the Javascript side for user-facing interface stuff,
> can at last have a path out we can help contribute to without needing to
> untangle NPM and friends: Spritely's Hoot project should allow us to
> deliver browser-side scheme execution very soon!
>
> That will make Guile a *much* more interesting target for web
> development :)
>
Also, if I may chime in: folk use Javascript to
more or less achieve some type of interactivity.
This is something I've had to explore at work, and
I'm settling on scheme for a back-end and HTMX for
a front-end if one needs fancy things that can't
be pulled to the back-end.  My point is, for
interface facing stuff, one could try and keep
that javascript to a minimum---Javascript fatigue
anyone?---and consequently, one would not have to
worry about NPM and friends.  Just my 2¢s.

-- 
(Life is like a pencil that will surely run out,
    but will leave the beautiful writing of life.)
(D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F
    (hkp://keys.openpgp.org))

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 865 bytes --]