From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Synchronizing descriptions with GSRC?
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:06:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87fvveeh00.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8738rm9lz5.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2qqp0j7.fsf@naga.invergo.net>
	<87hag26pis.fsf@gnu.org> <8738rfbisc.fsf@naga.invergo.net>
	<87mwpn1lzl.fsf@karetnikov.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35099)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Uz6Bj-00053B-5U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:25:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Uz6Bh-0000Yv-SF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:25:11 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:44848)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Uz5yi-0003E6-Kh
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87mwpn1lzl.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of
	"Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:45:02 +0400")
List-Id: <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Brandon Invergo <brandon@invergo.net>

Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org> skribis:

>> That sounds fine then.  I was probably being overly cautious.
>
> I share your concerns.  Could you ask the FSF?

Could you be more specific about what your concerns are?  AFAIK most GNU
web pages where we/I took summaries from at copyright FSF, to start with.

Of course I=E2=80=99m all in favor of clarifying any issues that could exis=
t,
and I=E2=80=99m all ears for advice on that.

Now, saying that this might =E2=80=9Cspoil years of work=E2=80=9D is clearl=
y an
overstatement.  When I asked Karl about this some time ago, he wasn=E2=80=
=99t
concerned, even wondering whether a descriptive paragraph like these
could be subject to copyright.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.