From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging.
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:57:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87fvtt8ree.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <521D1E38.9090604@gmail.com> <87sixuc71q.fsf@gnu.org>
	<521E423C.7010107@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37131)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VEmtG-0002zY-SO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:03:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VEmt8-0006H6-UO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:02:58 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:51587)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VEmt8-0006H0-MT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:02:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <521E423C.7010107@gmail.com> (Cyril Roelandt's message of "Wed,
	28 Aug 2013 20:32:28 +0200")
List-Id: <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:

> On 08/28/2013 02:51 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:

[...]

>>> I would also like to define a standard way to order the "#:use-module"
>>> at the beginning of each file, and agree on other "cosmetic" rules.
>>
>> Not convinced about the ordering.  ;-)
>>
>
> Isn't there such a convention in Scheme ?

Not that I know of.

I generally put the (guix ...) modules first, and the (gnu ...) second,
I think.  IOW, the =E2=80=9Cfoundational=E2=80=9D first.

>> These are good examples of the kind of rules we may want to discuss and
>> adopt.
>
>
> I'm also wondering how to name python packages. foo ? python-foo and
> python3-foo ? python2-foo and python-foo ?

Presumably pythonX-foo.  Andreas?

Ludo=E2=80=99.