Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> 宋文武 <iyzsong@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> +    (license (list gpl2+ bsd-2))))
>
> Could you add a comment above explaining what is meant here: is it
> dual-licensing?  Or does it mean that some files are GPL’d while others
> are BSD?
>
> In the latter case, the combined work is GPL, so ‘license’ should be
> just gpl2+.  It’s a good idea, though, to add a comment stating that
> some files are under another license.
Yes, it's GPL, while libtiled and tmxviewer are under BSD.
>
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> 宋文武 writes:
>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/tiled.scm: New file.
>>>> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
>>>> ---
>>>>  gnu-system.am          |  1 +
>>>>  gnu/packages/tiled.scm | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 gnu/packages/tiled.scm
>>>
>>> Would it make sense to put this new package in gnu/packages/games.scm
>>> instead?
>> Well, I'll prefer editors.scm or graphics.scm.
>
> I’m of the opinion of Eric here.  “editors” and “graphics” seem like
> very vague categories to me.  Or did you have other packages in mind
> that would fit in there?
Maybe gimp and inkscape? Yeah, games does make sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Here is my new patch: