From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Thompson Subject: Re: Sdl-union not exported Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:15:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87fvahiz8m.fsf@fsf.org> References: <20150207123929.GA18188@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6At-0007o0-NU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:15:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6As-0005MF-Rd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:15:55 -0500 Received: from mail.fsf.org ([208.118.235.13]:39361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6As-0005MB-P4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:15:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150207123929.GA18188@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge , guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > currently, the package sdl-union is not exported from sdl.scm. Is this > intentional or an oversight? Intentional. sdl-union is used only as an input to other packages, so we don't want it to show up when viewing the public package list. If you'd like to use sdl-union from another module, private variables may be referenced with '@@'. (@@ (gnu packages sdl) sdl-union) -- David Thompson Web Developer - Free Software Foundation - http://fsf.org GPG Key: 0FF1D807 Support the FSF: https://fsf.org/donate