From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-build-current-package-definition'. Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv368foo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1437814197-6321-1-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <1437814197-6321-8-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <87twrwu1ec.fsf@gnu.org> <877for2e9t.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUYf9-0002Hl-LP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:14:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUYf8-0006h5-Qv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:14:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877for2e9t.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:51:10 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-08-18 17:17 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Suggested by Ludovic Court=C3=A8s . >>> >>> * emacs/guix-guile.el (guix-guile-definition-regexp): New variable. >>> (guix-guile-current-definition): New function. >>> * emacs/guix-devel.el (guix-devel-build-current-package-definition): New >>> command. >>> * doc/emacs.texi (Emacs Development): Document it. >> >> The subject line is incorrect. > > Ah, indeed! It should be: > > emacs: Add 'guix-devel-build-current-package-definition'. > > Is that OK? Yes. >> Also, what about suggesting or even defining a key binding for this one? >> It sounds very useful. > > There is an example of defining a key binding for a command in this > section. As for the real defining, not sure if it is worth, but yeah, > why not. We may define 'guix-minor-mode', for example, with > guix-specific key bindings. But I don't know what bindings to use: > 'geiser-mode' already binds many commands to [C-c =E2=80=A6]. Perhaps to= put > the additional keys in [C-c g =E2=80=A6]? Yes, =E2=80=98guix-minor-mode=E2=80=99 and C-c g both sound like good ideas= to me. Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.