From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: python-sqlalchemy: Update to 1.0.11 (oops: fixed name). Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:03:08 -0800 Message-ID: <87fux2yfdf.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <56b8c867.Mt4UAAdU6v84queb%pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> <87y4avxgdp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20160208194652.GA2854@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSupw-0005Wk-AE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:03:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSupr-0001Pm-7w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:03:16 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:55698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSupr-0001Pi-3W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:03:11 -0500 In-reply-to: <20160208194652.GA2854@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:26:42AM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >> Pjotr Prins writes: >> >> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-sqlalchemy): >> > Update to 1.0.11 > > [...] > >> LGTM, push it! >> >> . o O (iirc, version bump pushes are often ok to just push to guix) >> (master if you have commit access without review, right?) > > I'd say they're fine to push if they are a leaf package or a seldom used > library. On the other hand, if many things depend on them, it's best to > ask, or push to a staging branch if you already know that's the answer. Thanks for the clarity!