From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Texlive-texmf
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:04:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87fuw1pchd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160225201935.GA24416@solar> <87io1bys72.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160228083212.GA16394@solar> <87a8mhi5pc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160302100844.GA3539@solar> <87a8mfbii6.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160305210432.GA28087@solar> <87bn6qqlyv.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160307225204.1ed3730e@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48065)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1adDYy-0007Ss-Bj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 04:04:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1adDYv-0000Ev-2u
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 04:04:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160307225204.1ed3730e@openmailbox.org> (Eric Bavier's message
	of "Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:52:04 -0600")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>>=20
>> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:=
=20=20
>> >> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:=20=20
>> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
>> >> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake,
>> >> > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion.
>> >> > So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days.=20=20
>> >> OK.=20=20
>> >
>> > Well, in the end this is not so easily possible.
>> >
>> > gnuplot depends on texlive-bin as a native-input. I replaced this by
>> > texlive-minimal, but I think the native input can be dropped completel=
y.=20=20
>>=20
>> Not sure.  Eric added the dependency on TeX Live in 97003b5c.
>> Eric, WDYT?
>
> Gnuplot looks for some binaries to determine whether and where to
> install some latex sty files.  As long as those are still installed with
> texlive-minimal, that should be fine.  I used texlive-bin in order to
> remove the heavyweight texlive dependency.

Would Gnuplot=E2=80=99s own sty files still be installed if we remove the
dependency?  Or are they redundant with what TeX Live provides?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.