From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Removing compilers that cannot be bootstrapped
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:23:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87fuvitrab.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAJ=RwfYrKDCbPLtQz7xrm9og7zE0BpTZ+jeX=hMvEpT4LW+hUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<61b3756456285d436389fbf9e5ec61f1@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40250)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aiP6B-0007jQ-Nv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:24:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aiP66-0001YQ-PH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:24:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <61b3756456285d436389fbf9e5ec61f1@openmailbox.org>
	(rain1@openmailbox.org's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:43:30 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: rain1@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

rain1@openmailbox.org skribis:

> I would like to propose one idea to manage this: What about adding a
> field to the system configuration for a list of 'trusted-binaries'?

To me it sounds like sidestepping the issue.

We=E2=80=99d want the whole distro to be trustworthy.

Ludo=E2=80=99.